The bio aof fsync fd may be closed by main thread (AOFRW done handler)
and even possibly reused for another socket, pipe, or file.
This can can an EBADF or EINVAL fsync error, which will lead to -MISCONF errors failing all writes.
We just ignore these errno because aof fsync did not really fail.
We handle errno when fsyncing aof in bio, so we could know the real reason
when users get -MISCONF Errors writing to the AOF file error
Issue created with #8419
The bio aof fsync fd may be closed by main thread (AOFRW done handler)
and even possibly reused for another socket, pipe, or file.
This can can an EBADF or EINVAL fsync error, which will lead to -MISCONF errors failing all writes.
We just ignore these errno because aof fsync did not really fail.
We handle errno when fsyncing aof in bio, so we could know the real reason
when users get -MISCONF Errors writing to the AOF file error
Issue created with #8419
When replica diskless-load type is swapdb in cluster mode, we didn't backup
keys to slots map, so we will lose keys to slots map if fail to sync.
Now we backup keys to slots map at first, and restore it properly when fail.
This commit includes a refactory/cleanup of the backups mechanism (moving it to db.c and re-structuring it a bit).
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
(cherry picked from commit 10712afaf3)
When replica diskless-load type is swapdb in cluster mode, we didn't backup
keys to slots map, so we will lose keys to slots map if fail to sync.
Now we backup keys to slots map at first, and restore it properly when fail.
This commit includes a refactory/cleanup of the backups mechanism (moving it to db.c and re-structuring it a bit).
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
(cherry picked from commit b55a827ea2)
On FLUSHDB or full sync, reset old average TTL stat.
This Stat is incrementally collected by the master over time when it searches for expired keys.
(cherry picked from commit b6916ca91c)
On FLUSHDB or full sync, reset old average TTL stat.
This Stat is incrementally collected by the master over time when it searches for expired keys.
(cherry picked from commit c85bf2352d)
In redisFork(), we don't set child pid, so updateDictResizePolicy()
doesn't take effect, that isn't friendly for copy-on-write.
The bug was introduced this in redis 6.0: e70fbad
(cherry picked from commit 16e3af9d23)
In redisFork(), we don't set child pid, so updateDictResizePolicy()
doesn't take effect, that isn't friendly for copy-on-write.
The bug was introduced this in redis 6.0: 56258c6
(cherry picked from commit 89c78a9808)
If we only has one node in cluster or before 8fdc857, we don't know myself ip, so we should use config.hostip for myself.
However, we should use the IP from the command response to update node->ip if it exists and is different from config.hostip
otherwise, when there's more than one node in cluster, if we use -h with virtual IP or DNS, benchmark doesn't show node real ip and port of myself even though it could get right IP and port by CLUSTER NODES command.
If we only has one node in cluster or before 8fdc857, we don't know myself ip, so we should use config.hostip for myself.
However, we should use the IP from the command response to update node->ip if it exists and is different from config.hostip
otherwise, when there's more than one node in cluster, if we use -h with virtual IP or DNS, benchmark doesn't show node real ip and port of myself even though it could get right IP and port by CLUSTER NODES command.
As we know, redis may reject user's requests or evict some keys if
used memory is over maxmemory. Dictionaries expanding may make
things worse, some big dictionaries, such as main db and expires dict,
may eat huge memory at once for allocating a new big hash table and be
far more than maxmemory after expanding.
There are related issues: #4213#4583
More details, when expand dict in redis, we will allocate a new big
ht[1] that generally is double of ht[0], The size of ht[1] will be
very big if ht[0] already is big. For db dict, if we have more than
64 million keys, we need to cost 1GB for ht[1] when dict expands.
If the sum of used memory and new hash table of dict needed exceeds
maxmemory, we shouldn't allow the dict to expand. Because, if we
enable keys eviction, we still couldn't add much more keys after
eviction and rehashing, what's worse, redis will keep less keys when
redis only remains a little memory for storing new hash table instead
of users' data. Moreover users can't write data in redis if disable
keys eviction.
What this commit changed ?
Add a new member function expandAllowed for dict type, it provide a way
for caller to allow expand or not. We expose two parameters for this
function: more memory needed for expanding and dict current load factor,
users can implement a function to make a decision by them.
For main db dict and expires dict type, these dictionaries may be very
big and cost huge memory for expanding, so we implement a judgement
function: we can stop dict to expand provisionally if used memory will
be over maxmemory after dict expands, but to guarantee the performance
of redis, we still allow dict to expand if dict load factor exceeds the
safe load factor.
Add test cases to verify we don't allow main db to expand when left
memory is not enough, so that avoid keys eviction.
Other changes:
For new hash table size when expand. Before this commit, the size is
that double used of dict and later _dictNextPower. Actually we aim to
control a dict load factor between 0.5 and 1.0. Now we replace *2 with
+1, since the first check is that used >= size, the outcome of before
will usually be the same as _dictNextPower(used+1). The only case where
it'll differ is when dict_can_resize is false during fork, so that later
the _dictNextPower(used*2) will cause the dict to jump to *4 (i.e.
_dictNextPower(1025*2) will return 4096).
Fix rehash test cases due to changing algorithm of new hash table size
when expand.
As we know, redis may reject user's requests or evict some keys if
used memory is over maxmemory. Dictionaries expanding may make
things worse, some big dictionaries, such as main db and expires dict,
may eat huge memory at once for allocating a new big hash table and be
far more than maxmemory after expanding.
There are related issues: #4213#4583
More details, when expand dict in redis, we will allocate a new big
ht[1] that generally is double of ht[0], The size of ht[1] will be
very big if ht[0] already is big. For db dict, if we have more than
64 million keys, we need to cost 1GB for ht[1] when dict expands.
If the sum of used memory and new hash table of dict needed exceeds
maxmemory, we shouldn't allow the dict to expand. Because, if we
enable keys eviction, we still couldn't add much more keys after
eviction and rehashing, what's worse, redis will keep less keys when
redis only remains a little memory for storing new hash table instead
of users' data. Moreover users can't write data in redis if disable
keys eviction.
What this commit changed ?
Add a new member function expandAllowed for dict type, it provide a way
for caller to allow expand or not. We expose two parameters for this
function: more memory needed for expanding and dict current load factor,
users can implement a function to make a decision by them.
For main db dict and expires dict type, these dictionaries may be very
big and cost huge memory for expanding, so we implement a judgement
function: we can stop dict to expand provisionally if used memory will
be over maxmemory after dict expands, but to guarantee the performance
of redis, we still allow dict to expand if dict load factor exceeds the
safe load factor.
Add test cases to verify we don't allow main db to expand when left
memory is not enough, so that avoid keys eviction.
Other changes:
For new hash table size when expand. Before this commit, the size is
that double used of dict and later _dictNextPower. Actually we aim to
control a dict load factor between 0.5 and 1.0. Now we replace *2 with
+1, since the first check is that used >= size, the outcome of before
will usually be the same as _dictNextPower(used+1). The only case where
it'll differ is when dict_can_resize is false during fork, so that later
the _dictNextPower(used*2) will cause the dict to jump to *4 (i.e.
_dictNextPower(1025*2) will return 4096).
Fix rehash test cases due to changing algorithm of new hash table size
when expand.
When replica diskless-load type is swapdb in cluster mode, we didn't backup
keys to slots map, so we will lose keys to slots map if fail to sync.
Now we backup keys to slots map at first, and restore it properly when fail.
This commit includes a refactory/cleanup of the backups mechanism (moving it to db.c and re-structuring it a bit).
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
When replica diskless-load type is swapdb in cluster mode, we didn't backup
keys to slots map, so we will lose keys to slots map if fail to sync.
Now we backup keys to slots map at first, and restore it properly when fail.
This commit includes a refactory/cleanup of the backups mechanism (moving it to db.c and re-structuring it a bit).
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
If we enable diskless replication, set repl-diskless-sync-delay to 0,
and master has non-rdb child process such as rewrite aof child, master
will try to start to a new BGSAVE but fails immediately (before fork)
when replicas ask for full synchronization, and master always fails
to start a new BGSAVE and disconnects with replicas until non-rdb
child process exists.
this bug was introduced in #6271 (not yet released in 6.0.x)
If we enable diskless replication, set repl-diskless-sync-delay to 0,
and master has non-rdb child process such as rewrite aof child, master
will try to start to a new BGSAVE but fails immediately (before fork)
when replicas ask for full synchronization, and master always fails
to start a new BGSAVE and disconnects with replicas until non-rdb
child process exists.
this bug was introduced in #6271 (not yet released in 6.0.x)
In redisFork(), we don't set child pid, so updateDictResizePolicy()
doesn't take effect, that isn't friendly for copy-on-write.
The bug was introduced this in redis 6.0: e70fbad
In redisFork(), we don't set child pid, so updateDictResizePolicy()
doesn't take effect, that isn't friendly for copy-on-write.
The bug was introduced this in redis 6.0: 56258c6
If we fail or stop to rewrite aof, we need to remove temporary aof.
We also remove temporary rdb when replicas abort to receive rdb.
But currently we delete them in main thread, to avoid blocking,
we should use bg_unlink to remove them in a background thread.
Btw, we have already used this way to removed child process temporary rdb.
(cherry picked from commit 5bb220660e)
If we fail or stop to rewrite aof, we need to remove temporary aof.
We also remove temporary rdb when replicas abort to receive rdb.
But currently we delete them in main thread, to avoid blocking,
we should use bg_unlink to remove them in a background thread.
Btw, we have already used this way to removed child process temporary rdb.
(cherry picked from commit aaacb8c955)
We may access and modify these two variables in signal handler function,
to guarantee them async-signal-safe, so we should set them to volatile
sig_atomic_t type.
It doesn't look like this could have caused any real issue, and it seems that
signals are handled in main thread on most platforms. But we want to follow C
and POSIX standard in signal handler function.
(cherry picked from commit 917043fa43)
We may access and modify these two variables in signal handler function,
to guarantee them async-signal-safe, so we should set them to volatile
sig_atomic_t type.
It doesn't look like this could have caused any real issue, and it seems that
signals are handled in main thread on most platforms. But we want to follow C
and POSIX standard in signal handler function.
(cherry picked from commit f1863a1fe7)
Before this commit, we would have continued to add replies to the reply buffer even if client
output buffer limit is reached, so the used memory would keep increasing over the configured limit.
What's more, we shouldn’t write any reply to the client if it is set 'CLIENT_CLOSE_ASAP' flag
because that doesn't conform to its definition and we will close all clients flagged with
'CLIENT_CLOSE_ASAP' in ‘beforeSleep’.
Because of code execution order, before this, we may firstly write to part of the replies to
the socket before disconnecting it, but in fact, we may can’t send the full replies to clients
since OS socket buffer is limited. But this unexpected behavior makes some commands work well,
for instance ACL DELUSER, if the client deletes the current user, we need to send reply to client
and close the connection, but before, we close the client firstly and write the reply to reply
buffer. secondly, we shouldn't do this despite the fact it works well in most cases.
We add a flag 'CLIENT_CLOSE_AFTER_COMMAND' to mark clients, this flag means we will close the
client after executing commands and send all entire replies, so that we can write replies to
reply buffer during executing commands, send replies to clients, and close them later.
We also fix some implicit problems. If client output buffer limit is enforced in 'multi/exec',
all commands will be executed completely in redis and clients will not read any reply instead of
partial replies. Even more, if the client executes 'ACL deluser' the using user in 'multi/exec',
it will not read the replies after 'ACL deluser' just like before executing 'client kill' itself
in 'multi/exec'.
We added some tests for output buffer limit breach during multi-exec and using a pipeline of
many small commands rather than one with big response.
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3085577c09)
Before this commit, we would have continued to add replies to the reply buffer even if client
output buffer limit is reached, so the used memory would keep increasing over the configured limit.
What's more, we shouldn’t write any reply to the client if it is set 'CLIENT_CLOSE_ASAP' flag
because that doesn't conform to its definition and we will close all clients flagged with
'CLIENT_CLOSE_ASAP' in ‘beforeSleep’.
Because of code execution order, before this, we may firstly write to part of the replies to
the socket before disconnecting it, but in fact, we may can’t send the full replies to clients
since OS socket buffer is limited. But this unexpected behavior makes some commands work well,
for instance ACL DELUSER, if the client deletes the current user, we need to send reply to client
and close the connection, but before, we close the client firstly and write the reply to reply
buffer. secondly, we shouldn't do this despite the fact it works well in most cases.
We add a flag 'CLIENT_CLOSE_AFTER_COMMAND' to mark clients, this flag means we will close the
client after executing commands and send all entire replies, so that we can write replies to
reply buffer during executing commands, send replies to clients, and close them later.
We also fix some implicit problems. If client output buffer limit is enforced in 'multi/exec',
all commands will be executed completely in redis and clients will not read any reply instead of
partial replies. Even more, if the client executes 'ACL deluser' the using user in 'multi/exec',
it will not read the replies after 'ACL deluser' just like before executing 'client kill' itself
in 'multi/exec'.
We added some tests for output buffer limit breach during multi-exec and using a pipeline of
many small commands rather than one with big response.
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
(cherry picked from commit 57709c4bc6)
If we fail or stop to rewrite aof, we need to remove temporary aof.
We also remove temporary rdb when replicas abort to receive rdb.
But currently we delete them in main thread, to avoid blocking,
we should use bg_unlink to remove them in a background thread.
Btw, we have already used this way to removed child process temporary rdb.
If we fail or stop to rewrite aof, we need to remove temporary aof.
We also remove temporary rdb when replicas abort to receive rdb.
But currently we delete them in main thread, to avoid blocking,
we should use bg_unlink to remove them in a background thread.
Btw, we have already used this way to removed child process temporary rdb.
We may access and modify these two variables in signal handler function,
to guarantee them async-signal-safe, so we should set them to volatile
sig_atomic_t type.
It doesn't look like this could have caused any real issue, and it seems that
signals are handled in main thread on most platforms. But we want to follow C
and POSIX standard in signal handler function.
We may access and modify these two variables in signal handler function,
to guarantee them async-signal-safe, so we should set them to volatile
sig_atomic_t type.
It doesn't look like this could have caused any real issue, and it seems that
signals are handled in main thread on most platforms. But we want to follow C
and POSIX standard in signal handler function.
Before this commit, we would have continued to add replies to the reply buffer even if client
output buffer limit is reached, so the used memory would keep increasing over the configured limit.
What's more, we shouldn’t write any reply to the client if it is set 'CLIENT_CLOSE_ASAP' flag
because that doesn't conform to its definition and we will close all clients flagged with
'CLIENT_CLOSE_ASAP' in ‘beforeSleep’.
Because of code execution order, before this, we may firstly write to part of the replies to
the socket before disconnecting it, but in fact, we may can’t send the full replies to clients
since OS socket buffer is limited. But this unexpected behavior makes some commands work well,
for instance ACL DELUSER, if the client deletes the current user, we need to send reply to client
and close the connection, but before, we close the client firstly and write the reply to reply
buffer. secondly, we shouldn't do this despite the fact it works well in most cases.
We add a flag 'CLIENT_CLOSE_AFTER_COMMAND' to mark clients, this flag means we will close the
client after executing commands and send all entire replies, so that we can write replies to
reply buffer during executing commands, send replies to clients, and close them later.
We also fix some implicit problems. If client output buffer limit is enforced in 'multi/exec',
all commands will be executed completely in redis and clients will not read any reply instead of
partial replies. Even more, if the client executes 'ACL deluser' the using user in 'multi/exec',
it will not read the replies after 'ACL deluser' just like before executing 'client kill' itself
in 'multi/exec'.
We added some tests for output buffer limit breach during multi-exec and using a pipeline of
many small commands rather than one with big response.
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
Before this commit, we would have continued to add replies to the reply buffer even if client
output buffer limit is reached, so the used memory would keep increasing over the configured limit.
What's more, we shouldn’t write any reply to the client if it is set 'CLIENT_CLOSE_ASAP' flag
because that doesn't conform to its definition and we will close all clients flagged with
'CLIENT_CLOSE_ASAP' in ‘beforeSleep’.
Because of code execution order, before this, we may firstly write to part of the replies to
the socket before disconnecting it, but in fact, we may can’t send the full replies to clients
since OS socket buffer is limited. But this unexpected behavior makes some commands work well,
for instance ACL DELUSER, if the client deletes the current user, we need to send reply to client
and close the connection, but before, we close the client firstly and write the reply to reply
buffer. secondly, we shouldn't do this despite the fact it works well in most cases.
We add a flag 'CLIENT_CLOSE_AFTER_COMMAND' to mark clients, this flag means we will close the
client after executing commands and send all entire replies, so that we can write replies to
reply buffer during executing commands, send replies to clients, and close them later.
We also fix some implicit problems. If client output buffer limit is enforced in 'multi/exec',
all commands will be executed completely in redis and clients will not read any reply instead of
partial replies. Even more, if the client executes 'ACL deluser' the using user in 'multi/exec',
it will not read the replies after 'ACL deluser' just like before executing 'client kill' itself
in 'multi/exec'.
We added some tests for output buffer limit breach during multi-exec and using a pipeline of
many small commands rather than one with big response.
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
Wang Yuan
