4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Benedikt Meurer 3740764cca [debug][cleanup] Use consistent StepInto and StepOver naming.
In the Chrome DevTools Protocol, the step actions are named StepOut,
StepOver, and StepInto, but internally we used StepOut, StepNext, and
StepIn instead. This change adjusts the naming to be consistent.

Bug: chromium:901814, chromium:1162229
Change-Id: Id3502a1b0a4aadd94734ec3d1fef73c1782fa220
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2928510
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#74877}
2021-06-01 11:26:57 +00:00
jgruber b8ae2249a4 [tests] Fix assertFalse(exception) anti-pattern
Some debugging tests relied on the following anti-pattern:

 let exception = false;

 try {
   /* ... some code that may throw on test failure ... */
 } catch (e) {
   exception = e;
 }

 assertFalse(exception);

This may be problematic if a falseish value is thrown.

Change-Id: I02eace4cc656fc9581928a90ac53cda4dc72b30c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/972822
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52105}
2018-03-21 10:59:46 +00:00
Alexey Kozyatinskiy 0896586083 [inspector] improve return position of explicit return in non-async function
Goal of this CL: explicit return from non-async function has position after
return expression as return position (will unblock [1]).

BytecodeArrayBuilder has SetStatementPosition and SetExpressionPosition methods.
If one of these methods is called then next generated bytecode will get passed
position. It's general treatment for most cases.
Unfortunately it doesn't work for Returns:
- debugger requires source positions exactly on kReturn bytecode in stepping
  implementation,
- BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn and BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn
  generates more then one bytecode and general solution will put return position
  on first generated bytecode,
- it's not easy to split BuildReturn function into two parts to allow something
  like following in BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement since generated
  bytecodes are actually controlled by execution_control().
..->BuildReturnPrologue();
..->SetReturnPosition(stmt);
..->Return();

In this CL we pass ReturnStatement through ExecutionControl and use it for
position when we emit return bytecode right here.

So this CL only will improve return position for returns inside of non-async
functions, I'll address async functions later.

[1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/543161/

Change-Id: Iede512c120b00c209990bf50c20e7d23dc0d65db
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560738
Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46687}
2017-07-14 19:10:13 +00:00
yangguo 341b39f9d0 [debug-wrapper] migrate some scope related tests
R=jgruber@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5530

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2566093002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41688}
2016-12-14 07:20:33 +00:00